**Federal Judge Rules Against Copyright Advocate in Trump Dismissal Case: A Legal Comedy of Errors**
In a stunning turn of events that has left legal experts scratching their heads and comedians rolling on the floor, a federal judge has ruled against a copyright advocate in a case involving the dismissal of former President Donald Trump’s latest Twitter account. The case, which many are calling “the trial of the century” (or at least the trial of the week), has taken a bizarre twist that even the most seasoned courtroom drama writers couldn’t have scripted.
The copyright advocate, known only as “Captain Copyright” (real name: Barry McCopyrightface), argued that Trump’s tweets were so original that they deserved their own copyright protection. “I mean, have you seen his spelling? It’s like Shakespeare meets a toddler with a smartphone!” McCopyrightface exclaimed in a press conference, flanked by a team of bewildered lawyers and a parrot named “Tweetie.”
Judge Judy Justice, presiding over the case, was not impressed. “Look, I’ve seen a lot of ridiculous cases in my time, but this one takes the cake,” she said, rolling her eyes so hard they almost fell out. “If we start giving copyrights to tweets, we might as well start copyrighting cat videos and my Aunt Edna’s Facebook rants.”
In a surprising twist, the judge also ruled that Trump’s tweets were “public domain” because they were “so full of nonsense that they can’t possibly belong to anyone.” This decision has sparked outrage among Trump supporters, who are now demanding a new hashtag: #FreeTheTweets.
Meanwhile, McCopyrightface is reportedly planning to appeal the decision, claiming that he has “a strong case” and “a really cool cape.” As the legal circus continues, one thing is clear: in the world of copyright law, the only thing more confusing than the rules is the people trying to enforce them. Stay tuned for the next episode of “As the Court Turns.”
